This kind of prejudice cannot be regulated away and is the kind of social prejudice that actually creates diversity gaps. The only thing a policy can do is limit the ways prejudice manifests itself in official situations.
To truly correct the issue of ethnic and gender inequality, it has to be addressed at the fundamental level. Since affirmative action was first proven effective in the s, conditions have changed. It is now necessary to consider merit instead of simple statistical qualities Sturm Prejudice is no longer simply a matter of socioeconomic status or gender or ethnicity and the only way left to rise above social prejudices is through attention to individual value, rather than group identification Sidanius It might be easier to hope that affirmative action is still valid and effective, but social conditions change over time and a new tactic needs to be considered for addressing the issues that actually account for prejudice in the modern age, rather than the symptom of decades past.
As noted in the findings of Coate and Loury:. This can be especially true in an economic situation that currently faces the nation. Presently, finding employment is very difficult for almost everyone in the country as job growth continues to diminish. The influence that affirmative action has on the hiring process can, even if unwarranted, lead to hostile feelings and tension between races. Individuals that do not secure a job could blame the minorities that have jobs at a company because they received aid from a government program.
Individuals that claim this will usually also state that affirmative action will overlook a better-suited white worker to hire a minority worker in his place. Regardless of whether this claim is true, the mere existence of a program like affirmative action can create an environment of hostility and tension for minority workers even if they are the most qualified for the job.
In fact, the system in place can create an atmosphere where regardless of the skill set of a minority worker, they will be underappreciated and have their skills downplayed because of the rationale that they were hired simply because they belong to a minority. The statistical information provided from his study backs this statement, however the interesting aspect that he raises is the incorporation of the scrutiny that the program had to endure.
He notes the affirmative action has:. Generally, the racially discriminative practices that were once common occurrences during the early to mid 20th century have subsided, yet research shows a type of "reverse discrimination" that has been the result.
Society has moved more and more towards a world where the practices that the program is trying to defend against are becoming obsolete. This is not to claim that racism, as a whole is not an issue, however it is becoming, in some cases, almost an issue in the reverse of what was originally intended from the implication of affirmative action. The program now almost creates an opposite effect. Instead of continuing the practices that affirmative action has laid out for minorities--both men and women, the system should be looked at from the interior workings of companies.
It is no longer as prevalent of an issue of getting the minority workers into entry-level positions within a company and the history of affirmative action in education demonstrates the need for restructuring. The issue presents itself with their promotion and advancement once they have secured employment Thomas, Jr. By reconstructing the system, affirmative action can:. While this is still not the ideal solution to the iniquities which accompany affirmative action, it is a definite step in the right direction.
The issue of affirmative action can be applied to a larger issue for the nation as a whole, namely:. Instead, a solution that will either cover up the problem or keep it from becoming larger is created and replaced as needed over time. This is exactly what is seen with the issue of affirmative action. When it was first implemented in America, the issue of racial discrimination , as well as gender discrimination, was a large issue in the world of both employment and academics.
However, instead of combating the problem and making fundamental changes to the way that society deals with and views race and gender, the United States was forced to implement a program that forced those that may discriminate in their choosing process to have a certain number of openings be filled by minorities. As noted, when first implemented this system was not only needed but successful, however as it becomes more and more clear that the program has become outdated and needs either a major overhaul or to be shut down.
The factors of lack of public empathy and general laziness have reemerged and slowed the progression to a unified solution. Affirmative action did its job effectively and admirably, however society has shifted since it was first put into effect. This program has served its purpose and should be allowed to be retired with dignity knowing that it helped many minorities take the first step towards equality, especially during times when racism was a much larger issue that permeated into many different facets of everyday life.
To combat some of the issues that currently face affirmative action, there could be some changes that make it more of an all-encompassing program: Since there are initiatives and programs that already do a job similar to these, they could merge with affirmative action and form a larger, more powerful means to help those that have risen from a troubled upbringing. Case studies in various workplace scenarios have proven the relative ineffectiveness and unexpected results of the program.
A new system that addresses the issues that are more prevalent to today such as equal opportunity for advancement of a career should be investigated. Affirmative action once made sense, but today needs to be reconsidered. Social inequality no longer requires the dramatic oversight it once did.
More attention needs to be paid to qualitative factors than simple quantitative values that are based on an archaic metric. Unfortunately, with the system that is in place in the modern era, this is not being addressed. Even if affirmative action could still work, it would need to be more sophisticated and consider more variables than simple gender or ethnicity. These factors would have to be adjusted for demographics in whatever area they are being applied, making it a monumental challenge.
Coate, Stephen, and Glenn C. Sturm, Susan, and Lani Guinier. Reclaiming the Innovative Ideal. Ultius Blog, 07 Sep. Click here for more help with MLA citations. Essay on Affirmative Action. Click here for more help with APA citations. Click here for more help with CMS citations. Click here for more help with Turabian citations.
Though many employers believe that affirmative action help the company to become more diverse. Shaw, But it is necessary to stress that measures of affirmative action can only be performed in accordance with the following conditions: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy If any of these conditions are not met, then this is not an affirmative action but discrimination. Measures of affirmative action are always very controversial, because they mean a temporary preference for a particular group over another in order to compensate for past inequalities, and the provision of equal opportunities to the targeted groups for example, women, ethnic minorities at present, for the realization of all fundamental freedoms, particularly in education, employment and business.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy The essence of the positive discrimination is rather controversial. Proponents of affirmative action believe that it helps to increase the benefits of diversity in all sectors of society, as well as to compensate for damage caused discrimination.
Some argument for affirmative action are: Compensatory justice demands affirmative action programs. It is necessary to permit fairer competition. Shaw, The main objection is that positive discrimination, according to opponents, is in fact nothing more than a tool of infringing on the rights of the majority in favor of minorities.
Opponents of affirmative action argue that it reduces the value of the achievements of the individual, assessing the achievement of the principle of membership in a particular social group, rather than his qualifications.
Free Affirmative Action Essays - Affirmative Action is Against the Bible - Affirmative Action is Against the Bible America was known as the Land of Opportunity. Then it became evident that "opportunity" was only available to white men.
Free Affirmative Action Essays - Affirmative Action is Against the Bible - Affirmative Action is Against the Bible America was known as the Land of Opportunity. Then it became evident that "opportunity" was only available to white men. Later, laws were passed to ensure .
affirmative action essaysPros and Cons of Affirmative Action In reading the many articles in the Affirmative Action packet and viewing the film "Beyond Black and White: Affirmative Action in America" one can see many views on the subject. Affirmative action is an issue closely related to cultural diversity. It affects the entire employed and unemployed population of the United States. It affects the entire employed and unemployed population of the United States.
“affirmative action has increased the demand relative to white males for black males by %, for nonblack minority males by %, and for white females by %. Among females, it has increased the demand for blacks relative to whites by %” (Leonard ).5/5(1). As such, Affirmative action essay is quite popular among the students of social science and humanities. For any expert assistance to your Affirmative action essay, you can just approach godliterature.tk .