While both men fought for different causes they had a similar theme they both saw their people been treated unjustly. Mahatma Gandhi saw Indians been prosecuted on bass of there race. Both men knew that the only way to stop their prosecutors is by standing up to them.
Gandhi believes that the way to stop the prosecution of his people is by civil disobedience. Mahatma Gandhi used civil disobedience because he knew that it was the only way that the Indian people could fight the Great Britain laws.
Gandhi also said that Satyagrahis was a peaceful form of civil disobedience and violence is prohibited even when it would be in their favor. Another thing that Gandhi view on civil disobedience held was that when a person decide to be a part of the movement that he knows the consequences and is willing to pay the penalties for his actions.
Satyagrahis used news journals and books to inform the people about what was happening, which was a good way to keep all the member informed.
When all the does steps went into action Gandhi and a lot of Satyagrahis followers where send to jail. Gandhi strong believe in hi Satyagrahis was what helped him and the rest of the Indian community stop their prosecutors and gain some freedom for his people. Gandhi believed that his use for civil disobedience was justified because Great Britain and their government was treating the Indian unfair and would keep doing that until the Indian would stand up to them.
In same way as Gandhi used civil disobedience to protect his people from racial prosecution Martin Luther King Jr. King believed that only way to get his point across is by taking action but he just like Gandhi believed that the action that has to be taking should be in form of non-violent protest and with out use of any physical force.
King also says that to justify acts of civil disobedience you must have prove that wrong is been done to you and have fact to prove why you are opposing something or someone. King justified his act of civil disobedience by show that there was a lot of hatred towards the Negroes by the country police and court systems. He then say that after you have prove of that wrong is been done upon you try to show your fact to the opposite side and try to negotiate and come up with a solution that favors both sides.
King tried to negotiate with the political government but they refused to talk to him. Then he tried to take his negotiations to the economic community where he tried to come to some kind of compromise. Just as Gandhi said to his people King also told his people that the direct action they take would have to be done in a non-violent matter with never using any physical force against the opposition. He also told his followers as Gandhi told his that you would have to know the consequences and would be able to pay the penalties without and striking back with physical.
When all of his followers understood what they where getting them self in to King used his final step in his civil disobedience tactics. He took up direct action as the final step when nothing else worked.
He start to have sit-ins and marches he used does tactics because he believed that only in that matter will the government be force to give in and try to negotiate and give the colored people some respect and power. Just like Gandhi forced the Great Britain government to negotiated some type of compromise by not giving in and lets all of the Satyagrahis be send to jail with out fighting back. Civil disobedience is justified when its goal is to obtain equal rights and service for everyone, without causing physical damage to people and their property, and without breaking the just laws that are already enforced.
He recommended passive resistance as a form of tension that could lead to reform of unjust laws practiced by the government. Thoreau felt that the government had established order that resisted reform and change. Thoreau refused to pay the poll tax because the money was being used to finance the Mexican War.
Not only was Thoreau against the war itself but the war was over Texas which was to be used as a slave state. He believed strongly against paying money to a war he did not support, and would rather end up in jail than go against his will. It was important to Thoreau to get the public informed about the War, and make people think why it was wrong to support it.
His statements were to get people to think and take their own approach to the situation. Behind his words, Emerson means that he should follow his conscience regardless of what side it is on. In making this comment, Emerson urges us to not conform to society and do what is believe to be justice, which in fact can lead to civil disobedience just as Martin Luther king displayed.
MLK did not conform to society and stood up for what he believed. King used peaceful sit-ins and rallies to unite the black community. Blacks were forced to sit on the back of busses, use separate bathrooms, water fountains, spaces in a restaurant, and schools.
Segregation made the blacks feel inferior and unequal. King led many black protesters to use methods such as banning busses, sit ins, and marches. Those who commit civil disobedience do so, not to break the law, however to correct an injustice, and thus accept the consequences for breaking the law.
King is establishing that they have a goal to achieve: He further states that those who agree to acts of civil disobedience must do so accepting the consequences that come with it. Civil disobedience has sometimes been characterized as an attack on our democratic government, however this notion does not hold true.
- Civil Disobedience of Antigone and Mrs. Hale Civil disobedience is the purposeful violation of a law to show that it is unconstitutional or morally defective. In the plays, Antigone and Trifles, the female main characters commit an act of civil disobedience.
The term civil disobedience means “refusal to obey civil laws in an effort to induce change in governmental policy or legislation, characterized by nonviolent means”, theories on this term have been around for a long time.
When I converse with the freest of my neighbors, I perceive that, whatever they may say about the magnitude and seriousness of the question, and their regard for the public tranquillity, the long and the short of the matter is, that they cannot spare the protection of the existing government, and they dread the consequences to their property and families of disobedience to it. Civil Disobedience [Henry David Thoreau, Tony Darnell] on godliterature.tk *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. On the Duty of Civil Disobedience is an essay by American author Henry David Thoreau and was first published in with the title of "Resistance to Civil Government"/5(K).
Civil Disobedience Civil disobedience: “Refusal to obey civil laws in an effort to induce change in governmental policy or legislation, characterized by the use of passive resistance or other non-violent means” (Houghton, ). Free Essay: Civil Disobedience Henry Thoreau wrote an essay about it in the 19th century. Martin Luther King, Jr. preached it in the South. Mahatma Gandhi.