In Australia in , 35 people died when a man indiscriminately shot them. In the melee, 23 were wounded. This prompted the Australian government to think and implement strict rules regarding gun use. As a result, the number of mass killings in the Land Down Under has been reduced, if not completely eradicated.
There are politicians in America who support stronger gun control, such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Both of them thought of Australia as the model for stringent gun laws.
Other people argue that they need firearms because they use it for self-defense. They acquire a license for it, and as such, they are expected to use their weapons only when the need arises. Burglars, hostage attacks, and other forms of violence require people to stand up and fight, preferably with their weapon of choice. Life is precious, they say, and they can only protect their lives if they have the proper equipment.
It is interesting to note, however, that despite this rather smart take on gun use, there are people who go beyond the set perimeters. Intoxicated men go out, shout their lungs out, cursing the heavens for whatever they are suffering, and would suddenly vent out their frustrations to their neighbors. It is easy to say one cannot kill a person, or one will always use a gun only when needed. But when alcohol, drugs, or mental instability, or fury takes over, the lines between right and wrong fade.
People forget their oath. They forget they have neighbors who have done nothing wrong to them. All they think about is the need to fire a gun. Owning a gun is a huge responsibility. It takes more than sheer discipline to convince people that you would not use them for anything else other than self-defense. Those teenagers who massacred half a school used to be sons and daughters. They were not violent. They were the safe kind, and probably those who promised their parents they would not touch any weapon.
But then again, tables turn when you least expect it. It is being discussed everywhere — in the media, in the scientific journals on social studies, in the city councils and in the Congress. No wonder this topic also gets its share of attention in classrooms and every student has to write at least one gun control essay in the course of studies. Truly, gun control gives the most fertile ground for debate.
Some people stand on pro gun control positions and claim that the existing gun control regulations are critically insufficient. Other people argue that criminals procure guns illegally anyway, so conscious citizens should also have free access to firearms for self-defense.
Between these two extremes, there is also a great variety of viewpoints and opinions. If you want to discuss such a sensitive issue in an academic paper, you cannot afford to have an opinion based on nothing, like some people have. You have to be well-informed on the background of the issue, as well as on all the multitude of expert opinions about it. To do that, you first have to look at where it all began — the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States that was passed in and granted the individuals the right to possess firearms.
Since then, the understanding of the Second Amendment has evolved a great deal, and we are still far from consensus on this question.
The discussion continues on all levels, and a student's gun control essay is really just as good ground to discuss it as any other. A research on any topic suggests looking through all the information you find on this topic. With gun control, you will have no problem finding information, since there is a lot of it out there.
In fact, the amount of information on this topic is quite overwhelming — much more than one can digest at a time and much more than one may need to write an excellent essay. Given these massive amounts of potential sources of information, you should make sure that you are not wasting your time looking through sources that are irrelevant to your topic, even if they may be quite an exciting read. To do that, you need to make your research well planned out and know where to look the relevant information.
As we have already pointed out, when you want to get yourself well-informed on any particular issue, you begin with investigating its roots. When we talk about gun control discussion, it all roots from the Second Amendment.
It was passed along with the rest of the Bill of Rights at the very dawn of our country in the late 18 th century. There, the right for individual gun possession was first formulated and regulated. This document is the source of our entire understanding of individual gun possession, so you need to be familiar with this document if you look to talk about gun control and be taken seriously. Much time has passed since then, and there have been many precedents where the court had to rule to clarify certain aspects of the Second Amendment — on both state and federal levels.
The most noteworthy relevant court cases are as follows:. These and some other court cases have largely contributed to today's understanding of individual possession and gun control, so being familiar with them is also necessary for building your expertise on gun control.
Getting familiar with the historical background of the gun control discussion is only half of your research. You will also need to be aware of the present-day state of this ongoing discussion. To make it easier for you, we have taken the liberty and put together a selection of insightful pieces from both sides of the gun control discussion.
These pro gun control articles state that the current gun control regulations are not effective enough to confront gun violence and talk about how the situation can be improved:.
Since everybody talks about gun control today, Amanda Marcotte of the Rolling Stone magazine has also come up with this surprisingly insightful piece. She does not claim to be an expert but rather speaks from the stand of one of the people at whom pro-gun arguments are supposed to aim, and explains why they don't work.
If you feel like you are not well-informed enough about gun control, this article is priceless for you. It briefly sums up the spirit of the Second Amendment as it was years ago and follows its evolution through the years, as well as the evolution of firearms themselves.
This article is a detailed overview of the present-day gun control regulations in California, which is arguably the strictest in the land. They conclude by stating that the current regulations are not effective enough, as they involve a number of loopholes. The authors suggest that the regulations should be made even stricter.
Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment? Barrett points out that the language in the text of the Second Amendment is quite vague and leaves too much room for interpretation. So, instead of fixing or clarifying it, he suggests that a whole newest of regulations is necessary, clear and direct.
Bovy takes a more radical stand in this discussion. She claims that we need to get rid of individual gun possession as a whole, with no exceptions. In his time, Hamblin was fired for drafting a piece on gun control that was not approved by his superiors. In this article, he talks about how unhealthily politicized the topic is and how our society is incapable of seeing it as it is and not as an attack on our whole set of rights and freedoms. These anti gun control articles insist that the existing gun control regulations are ineffective because they are too strict and suggest that these regulations need to be loosened.
Here is what the experts from this side of the argument have to say:. DePhilippis and Hughes are convinced that the opinion that stricter gun regulations can end gun violence is wrong and that it is a myth that needs to be debunked.
If you want to read more from them, feel free to check out their gun violence prevention site Armed With Reason. Davidson takes a scholarly approach on the issue. He attempts to give a definition of gun control and critically scrutinize the most common gun control approaches and methods. This emotional piece is written by the widow of Chris Kyle whose tragic story was put on screen in American Sniper. If you want to know more about her take on gun control policy, you can read about it on her book American Wife: As a recognized author of books on crime and a respected teacher at Pepperdine University, Wilson uses his expertise to analyze what exactly pro gun control side has to offer.
He concludes that they are being too populist and have no concrete plan of action. Hunter works of Rand Paul, the conservative senator. The article focuses on stories where gun-owning individuals helped to confront crime and violence, as opposed to the stories where such individuals cause violence — that the pro gun control lobbyists like to manipulate.
Hardy is a practicing attorney from Arizona. He blames pro gun control activists for being deaf to arguments from the anti gun control camp and incapable of a constructive dialogue.
According to him, they only see their position and will not rest until all individual firearm possession is banned for good. Being well-informed about the gun control debate is crucial for writing an excellent gun control essay, but it is still only half the battle. You still need to know what kind of essay you have to submit and what your teacher expects of you. Here are the kinds of gun control essays that you may have to write:.
Since gun control is an extremely debatable topic, it is most exciting to talk about which side of the debate is right. This is why, students most often have to write either argumentative or persuasive essays on gun control. If you have to write a persuasive essay, you know what you should do first — pick a topic that can inspire a debate between at least two opposing sides.
You also need a compelling argument that you will defend. Here, you also have nothing to worry about, because both sides of the gun control debate have numerous compelling arguments. As soon as the latter two elements are in place, it is the high time to start your research. Putting it briefly, first, you get yourself familiar with the relevant historical background of the issue, and then you collect expert opinions.
Persuasive Essay: The Need for Stronger Gun Control Laws - Switzerland has compulsory gun ownership for military age males, yet it has a far lower murder rate than the U.S. But Switzerland also has far stricter gun control laws.
Gun Laws Argumentative Essay. 1, Gun Laws and Violence Each year, a number of people die from guns. The popular saying is “guns do not kill people, people kill people” which is true; however, guns are used to aid in violence and many would argue that eliminating guns through stricter laws would decrease violence.
The Pros and Cons of Gun Control - This essay will discuss the pros and cons of gun control. Some U.S. States have already adopted some of these gun control laws. Mar 24, · “Stricter state gun laws associated with fewer gun deaths, study finds.” The article discussed gun control laws in states with stricter laws tend to have lower rates of gun related homicides, and a suicide (ProCon para.
Argumentative Essay on Gun Control Gun Control Essay Gun Control A problem that has developed recently in our society is the debate over gun control. California’s Proposed Gun Laws Won’t Change Our Culture of Violence, But They Will Make Us Safer by LA Times Editorial Board. Process gun control essay. In a process essay, you explain how to do something – for example, how to solve a problem. You can talk about how gun violence can be confronted by imposing stricter gun control.